Best Project Management Tools for Editorial Teams & Newsrooms (2025 Edition)

Content Marketing 6 min read

Editorial chaos is real โ€” missed deadlines, scattered feedback, and โ€œwhoโ€™s editing this?โ€ on repeat. If that sounds familiar, youโ€™re not alone. The best project management tools for editorial teams and newsrooms are built to bring order to the madness โ€” keeping your content pipeline smooth, your team aligned, and your stories on schedule.

Here are 10 tools that do exactly that.

  • StoryChief โ€“ All-in-one editorial workflow & content distribution
  • Asana โ€“ Visual task management for editorial teams
  • ClickUp โ€“ Versatile project management with customizable views
  • Trello โ€“ Simple kanban boards for content planning
  • Wrike โ€“ Advanced project management for larger editorial teams
  • Airtable โ€“ Flexible database for editorial content management
  • Monday.com โ€“ Customizable workflows with communication tools
  • Notion โ€“ Flexible workspace for documentation and project management
  • Basecamp โ€“ Simplified project management for teams
  • Quintype โ€“ Digital publishing platform for newsrooms

1. StoryChief โ€“ All-in-One Editorial Workflow & Content Distribution

StoryChief is designed for content teams, offering a centralized platform to plan, create, and distribute content across multiple channels.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

Pros:

  • Real-time editing feedback enhances collaboration.
  • Seamless CMS integration streamlines publishing.
  • Multi-channel publishing ensures broad content reach.
  • Analytics tools provide insights into content performance.

Cons:

  • Some users may find the interface requires a learning curve

๐Ÿ”— Visit StoryChief


2. Asana โ€“ Visual Task Management for Editorial Teams

Asana offers a flexible platform to manage tasks and projects, making it easier for editorial teams to track progress and meet deadlines.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Customizable Workflows: Use boards, lists, or timelines to manage content production stages.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connect with tools like Slack, Google Drive, and more.
  • Task Assignments: Clearly define responsibilities and deadlines for team members.

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface with customizable workflows.
  • Supports multiple project views: list, board, calendar, and timeline.
  • Integration with various tools enhances functionality.

Cons:

  • Time tracking features are limited.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Asana


3. ClickUp โ€“ Versatile Project Management with Customizable Views

ClickUp is an all-in-one project management tool that offers a high level of customization, suitable for editorial teams with diverse needs.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • All-in-One Platform: Manage tasks, docs, goals, and chat within a single app.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views to fit editorial workflows.
  • Automation Features: Automate repetitive tasks to save time.

Pros:

  • Highly customizable dashboards and workflows.
  • Built-in time tracking and goal-setting features.
  • Real-time collaboration tools enhance team coordination.

Cons:

  • Some integrations may require additional setup.

๐Ÿ”— Visit ClickUp


4. Trello โ€“ Simple Kanban Boards for Content Planning

Trello provides a straightforward, visual approach to project management, ideal for editorial teams seeking simplicity.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Visual Boards: Organize content ideas and production stages using cards and lists.
  • Ease of Use: Quick to set up and intuitive for team collaboration.
  • Power-Ups: Enhance functionality with integrations like Calendar, Google Drive, and more.

Pros:

  • Intuitive drag-and-drop interface.
  • Customizable boards and cards for various workflows.
  • Integration with numerous third-party apps.

Cons:

  • Limited native reporting and analytics features.
  • May require additional tools for complex project management needs.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Trello


5. Wrike โ€“ Advanced Project Management for Larger Editorial Teams

Wrike offers robust project management features suitable for larger editorial teams handling complex projects.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Detailed Reporting: Track project progress with real-time analytics.
  • Custom Workflows: Design workflows tailored to editorial processes.
  • Collaboration Tools: Facilitate communication with built-in chat and document sharing.

Pros:

  • Detailed project tracking with Gantt charts and time logs.
  • Customizable dashboards and workflows.
  • Integration with a wide range of tools and platforms.

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Advanced features may come at a higher cost.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Wrike


6. Airtable โ€“ Flexible Database for Editorial Content Management

Airtable combines the simplicity of a spreadsheet with the complexity of a robust database, offering flexibility for content management.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Customizable Tables: Organize content calendars, assignments, and assets in a spreadsheet-database hybrid.
  • Views and Filters: Switch between grid, calendar, and Kanban views to suit your workflow.
  • Integration Options: Connect with various apps to streamline processes.

Pros:

  • Highly customizable tables and views.
  • Supports attachments, links, and rich text fields.
  • Integration with various apps and services.

Cons:

  • May require time to set up and customize for specific needs.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Airtable

7. Monday.com โ€“ Customizable Workflows with Communication Tools

Monday.com offers a flexible platform with visual project tracking, making it easier for editorial teams to manage content production and collaboration.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Visual Project Tracking: Utilize boards, timelines, and calendars to oversee content schedules.
  • Automation Features: Automate repetitive tasks to save time.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connect with tools like Slack, Google Drive, and more.

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface with customizable templates.
  • Robust integration options enhance workflow efficiency.
  • Automation features save time on repetitive tasks.

Cons:

  • Some users report that certain automations and integrations can be unreliable.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Monday.com


8. Notion โ€“ Flexible Workspace for Documentation and Project Management

Notion combines note-taking, databases, and task management, providing editorial teams with a centralized workspace for content planning and collaboration.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Customizable Templates: Create tailored workflows for content calendars, editorial guidelines, and more.
  • Integrated Documentation: Maintain all editorial documents and resources in one place.
  • Collaboration Tools: Real-time editing and commenting facilitate team coordination.

Pros:

  • Highly adaptable to various editorial processes.
  • Combines multiple tools into a single platform.
  • Customizable templates for tailored workflows.

Cons:

  • Performance issues with large databases or extensive content.
  • Lacks built-in time tracking and advanced project management features.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Notion


9. Basecamp โ€“ Simplified Project Management for Teams

Basecamp offers a straightforward approach to project management, focusing on communication and task tracking, which can benefit editorial teams seeking simplicity.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Centralized Communication: Message boards and real-time chat keep discussions organized.
  • Task Management: To-do lists and schedules help track content production.
  • File Storage: Easily share and store documents and media assets.

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface with minimal setup required.
  • Combines communication and project management tools.
  • Centralized communication with message boards and real-time chat.

Cons:

  • Lacks advanced features like time tracking, task dependencies, and Gantt charts.
  • Limited customization options and integrations.
  • No support for task prioritization or labels.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Basecamp


10. Quintype โ€“ Digital Publishing Platform for Newsrooms

Quintype is a digital publishing platform designed specifically for newsrooms, offering tools for content creation, distribution, and monetization.

Why itโ€™s great for editorial teams:

  • Headless CMS: Facilitates content creation and management across multiple platforms.
  • Multi-Channel Distribution: Publish content seamlessly to websites, apps, and social media.
  • Analytics and Monetization: Gain insights into content performance and implement subscription models.

Pros:

  • Tailored for the needs of digital newsrooms.
  • Supports multilingual content and regional publishing.
  • Headless CMS facilitates content creation and management across multiple platforms.

Cons:

  • May require technical expertise for initial setup.
  • Pricing information is less transparent compared to other tools.
  • Limited flexibility for teams seeking broader project management features beyond publishing.

๐Ÿ”— Visit Quintype


Final Thoughts

Selecting the best project management tools for editorial teams and newsrooms can significantly enhance the efficiency and collaboration of editorial teams and newsrooms. Here's a quick comparison to help you choose:

Best for...

  • All-in-One Editorial Workflow: StoryChief
  • Visual Task Management: Asana
  • Customizable Workflows: ClickUp
  • Simplicity and Ease of Use: Trello
  • Large Teams with Complex Projects: Wrike
  • Flexible Content Management: Airtable
  • Integrated Communication Tools: Monday.com
  • Documentation and Note-Taking: Notion
  • Simplified Project Management: Basecamp
  • Digital Publishing Needs: Quintype

FYI: With StoryChief, reporting and analytics are seamlessly integrated into one powerful tool, making it easier than ever to track and optimize your content performance. Create a free account and start optimizing content today. ๐Ÿ™Œ